Essay On Playground Vs Playstation

Screen addicts: Children spend more time in front of a computer or television every day than they spend exercising every week

By Liz Thomas
Updated: 11:25 GMT, 1 February 2011

Addicted: A study has found that youngsters are spending more than four and a half hours every day looking at TV or computer screens

Children in Britain sit in front of a TV or computer screen for four-and-a-half hours a day, alarming research reveals.

Youngsters now spend an average of one hour and 50 minutes online and two hours 40 minutes in front of the television every day.

A report released by research firm ChildWise suggests that screens are increasingly turning into electronic babysitters and young people in the UK are spending more time plugged in than ever.

It found that children spend more time in front of a screen in one day than they spend exercising in the entire week.

The worrying research found that 97 per cent of 11 to 16-year-olds own a mobile phone – eight per cent more than the percentage of adults who own one.

And it showed that young girls have a voracious appetite for celebrity magazines such as OK! and Heat rather than more traditional teenage fare such as Jackie.

The study came as an academic warned that youngsters are using mobile phones to learn about each others’ bodies and access X-rated porn rather than learning about such matters ‘behind the bike sheds’.

Dr Emma Bond, an expert in childhood and youth studies, said adults ‘need to take our heads out of the sand’ about what is happening to young, impressionable children.

‘The research shows how children are using mobile phones in obtaining sexual material, developing their sexual identities and in their intimate relationships with each other,’ she added.

The Monitor Report 2010-11 found that children spent only two hours a week exercising in school, and taking part in physical activity out of school.

Two in three children aged between five and 16, and 77 per cent of children aged 11 to 16, have their own television or personal computer and, despite fears about online safety, almost half have internet access in their own room.


The study questioned almost 2,500 five to 16-year-olds about their computer, TV and reading habits. The findings show most go online daily and spend much of their time on social networks and video sharing sites such as YouTube.

But despite the popularity of the internet, the next generation is still likely to be one of telly addicts.

Around 63 per cent of children have a television set in their room but as the popularity of laptops increases and programmes are increasingly available online this is likely to drop.

'Your mother found this mobile under your mattress'

A spokesman for ChildWise said: ‘The number of children with a laptop or PC now matches those with a television but TV continues to play an important role. The way they are watching is continually changing. Children are seeking out programming that they want, when they want it. 

‘Children’s online activity is moving towards personal access for all, so that, in the not too distant future the disadvantaged child will be the one without a laptop of their own.’

Despite Facebook supposedly being restricted to over-13s, more than two million children under that age now have a profile on the social networking site. It is named as their favourite website. 

The research found a third of all seven to ten-year-olds visited Facebook in the last week, along with 71 per cent of 11 and 12-year-olds and 85 per cent of 13-16-year-olds.

Even with the wide choice from digital and satellite channels and dedicated youth stations such as ITV2 and E4, BBC1 remains the most popular TV channel. 

EastEnders and The Simpsons are among their favourite programmes, along with the crude Channel 4 comedy about school life The Inbetweeners.

Margaret Morrissey of lobby group Parents Outloud, said children could not be blamed for spending time on the computer or in front of the TV.

On many housing estates gardens had been reduced to the size of a pocket handkerchief, she said. ‘We cannot complain as the generation in charge when they (children) use the things we have provided and don’t have space to do recreational things outdoors,’ she said.

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.

Share or comment on this article

1. Mehl MR, Vazire S, Ramirez-Esparza N, Slatcher RB, Pennebaker JW. Are women really more talkative than men? Science. 2007;317:82.[PubMed]

2. Wallentin M. Putative sex differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: A critical review. Brain Lang. 2009;108:175–183.[PubMed]

3. Lippa RA. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.; 2005. Gender, nature, and nurture.335

4. Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN. Stanford, , CA: Stanford University Press.; 1974. The psychology of sex differences.634

5. Ruble DN, Martin CL, Berenbaum SA. Gender development. In: Eisenberg N, editor. Social, emotional, and personality development. Hoboken, , NJ: Wiley; 2006. pp. 858–932.

6. Blakemore JEO, Berenbaum SA, Liben LS. New York: Psychology Press.; 2009. Gender development.519

7. Connellan J, Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Batki A, Ahluwalia J. Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behav Dev. 2000;23:113–118.

8. Lutchmaya S, Baron-Cohen S. Human sex differences in social and non-social looking preferences, at 12 months of age. Infant Behav Dev. 2002;25:319–325.

9. Hittelman JH, Dickes R. Sex differences in neonatal eye contact time. Merrill Palmer Q. 1979;25:171–184.

10. Leeb RT, Rejskind FG. Here's looking at you, kid! A longitudinal study of perceived gender differences in mutual gaze behavior in young infants. Sex Roles. 2004;50:1–5.

11. Lutchmaya S, Baron-Cohen S, Ragatt P. Foetal testosterone and eye contact in 12-month-old human infants. Infant Behav Dev. 2002;25:327–335.

12. Nagy E, Kompagne H, Orvos H, Pal A. Gender-related differences in neonatal imitation. Inf Child Dev. 2007;16:267–276.

13. Hall JA, Carter JD, Horgan TG. Gender differences in nonverbal communication of emotion. In: Fischer AH, editor. Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000. pp. 97–117.

14. McClure EB. A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychol Bull. 2000;126:424–453.[PubMed]

15. Happé FGE. The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Dev. 1995;66:843–855.[PubMed]

16. Charman T, Ruffman T, Clements W. Is there a gender difference in false belief development? Soc Dev. 2002;11:1–10.

17. Walker S. Gender differences in the relationship between young children's peer-related social competence and individual differences in theory of mind. J Genet Psychol. 2005;166:297–312.[PubMed]

18. Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Spinrad TL. Prosocial development. In: Eisenberg N, editor. Social, emotional, and personality development. Hoboken, , NJ: Wiley; 2006. pp. 646–718.

19. Walker S, Irving K, Berthelsen D. Gender influences on preschool children's social problem-solving strategies. J Genet Psychol. 2002;163:197–210.[PubMed]

20. Maccoby EE. Gender and relationships. A developmental account. Am Psychol. 1990;45:513–520.[PubMed]

21. Leaper C, Smith TE. A meta-analytic review of gender variations in children's language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Dev Psychol. 2004;40:993–1027.[PubMed]

22. Knickmeyer RC, Baron-Cohen S. Fetal testosterone and sex differences in typical social development and in autism. J Child Neurol. 2006;21:825–845.[PubMed]

23. Golombok S, Rust J, Zervoulis K, Croudace T, Golding J, et al. Developmental trajectories of sex-typed behavior in boys and girls: A longitudinal general population study of children aged 2.5–8 years. Child Dev. 2008;79:1583–1593.[PubMed]

24. Göncü A, Gaskins S. Mahwah, , NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.; 2007. Play and development: Evolutionary, sociocultural, and functional perspectives.328

25. Fromberg DP, Bergen D. New York: Routledge.; 2006. Play from birth to twelve: Contexts, perspectives, and meanings.455

26. Rubin KH, Bukowski WM, Parker JG. Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In: Eisenberg N, editor. Social, emotional, and personality development. Hoboken, , NJ: Wiley; 2006. pp. 571–645.

27. Coplan RJ, Rubin KH, Findley LC. Social and nonsocial play. In: Fromberg DP, Bergen D, editors. Play from birth to twelve: Contexts, perspectives, and meanings. New York: Routledge; 2006. pp. 75–86.

28. Coplan RJ, Arbeau K. Peer interactions and play in early childhood. In: Rubin KH, Bukowski W, Laursen B, editors. Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. New York: Guilford Press; 2008. pp. 143–161.

29. Howes C, Matheson CC. Sequences in the development of competent play with peers: Social and social pretend play. Dev Psychol. 1992;28:961–974.

30. Colwell MJ, Lindsey EW. Preschool children's pretend and physical play and sex of play partner: Connections to peer competence. Sex Roles. 2005;52:497–509.

31. Robinson CC, Anderson GT, Porter CL, Hart CH, Wouden-Miller M. Sequential transition patterns of preschoolers' social interactions during child-initiated play: Is parallel-aware play a bidirectional bridge to other play states? Early Child Res Q. 2003;18:3–21.

32. Parten MB. Social participation among preschool children. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1932;27:243–269.

33. Bornstein MH, Hahn CS, Haynes OM. Specific and general language performance across early childhood: Stability and gender considerations. First Lang. 2004;24:267–304.

34. Harris PL. Social cognition. In: Kuhn D, Siegler R, editors. Cognition, perception, and language. Hoboken, , NJ: Wiley; 2006. pp. 811–858.

35. Smith PK. Evolutionary foundations and functions of play: An overview. In: Göncü A, Gaskins S, editors. Play and development: Evolutionary, sociocultural, and functional perspectives. Mahwah, , NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007. pp. 21–49.

36. Pellegrini AD, Smith PK. The development of play during childhood: Forms and possible functions. Child Psycho Psychiatry Review. 1998;3:51–57.

37. Berenbaum SA, Martin CL, Hanish LD, Briggs PT, Fabes RA. Sex differences in children's play. In: Becker JB, Geary KJ, Hampson E, Herman JP, Young EA, editors. Sex differences in the brain: From genes to behavior. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. pp. 275–290.

38. Hines M. New York: Oxford University Press.; 2004. Brain gender.307

39. Jadva V, Hines M, Golombok S. Infants' preferences for toys, colors, and shapes: Sex differences and similarities. Arch Sex Behav. 2010 DOI 10.1007/s10508-010-9618-z. [PubMed]

40. Brenner M, Omark DR. The effects of sex, structure and social interaction on preschoolers' play behaviors in naturalistic setting. Instr Sci. 1979;8:91–105.

41. Cherney ID, Kelly-Vance L, Glover KG, Ruane A, Ryalls BO. The effects of stereotyped toys and gender on play assessment in children aged 18–47 months. Educational Psychology. 2003;23:95–106.

42. Martin CL, Fabes RA. The stability and consequences of young children's same-sex peer interactions. Dev Psychol. 2001;37:431–446.[PubMed]

43. Murray L, Fiori-Cowley A, Hooper R, Cooper P. The impact of postnatal depression and associated adversity on early mother-infant interactions and later infant outcome. Child Dev. 1996;67:2512–2526.[PubMed]

44. Morisset CE, Barnard KE, Booth CL. Toddlers' language development: Sex differences within social risk. Dev Psychol. 1995;31:851–865.

45. Lutchmaya S, Baron-Cohen S, Ragatt P. Foetal testosterone and vocabulary size in 18- and 24-month-old infants. Infant Behav Dev. 2002;24:418–424.

46. Auyeung B, Baron-Cohen S, Ashwin E, Knickmeyer R, Taylor K, et al. Fetal testosterone predicts sexually differentiated childhood behavior in girls and in boys. Psychol Sci. 2009;20:144–148.[PMC free article][PubMed]

47. Auyeung B, Baron-Cohen S, Ashwin E, Knickmeyer R, Taylor K, et al. Foetal testosterone and autistic traits. Br J Psychol. 2009;100:1–22.[PubMed]

48. Huttenlocher J, Haight W, Bryk A, Seltzer M, Lyons T. Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Dev Psychol. 1991;27:236–248.

49. Galsworthy MJ, Dionne G, Dale PS, Plomin R. Sex differences in early verbal and non-verbal cognitive development. Dev Sci. 2000;3:206–215.

50. Iervolino AC, Hines M, Golombok SE, Rust J, Plomin R. Genetic and environmental influences on sex-typed behavior during the preschool years. Child Dev. 2005;76:826–840.[PubMed]

51. Altmann J. Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour. 1974;49:227–267.[PubMed]

0 thoughts on “Essay On Playground Vs Playstation”

    -->

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *